Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 54(4): e18008, 2018. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001592

RESUMO

The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of human albumin in a Brazilian university hospital, in compliance with the institutional protocol and other clinical guidelines, taking into account the therapeutic indications and the dosage regimens. Data was obtained from the pharmacy dispensing records of human albumin, the requests for use it and, when available, the patient's records between January and October 2017. After evaluation the therapeutic indications and the dosage regimens were classified as "appropriate" and "inappropriate". The analysis of 98 requests showed that, when compared to the institutional protocol, 54 (55.1%) requests had an inappropriate therapeutic indication. However, when a comparison was made between 25 medical records (54 requests) and other clinical guidelines, it was observed that the therapeutic indication had none classified as inappropriate. In addition, 16 (29.7%) requests were considered inappropriate in relation to dosage regimens. From these results, it was possible to conclude that although the use of human albumin in the hospital was associated to a clinical protocol, it was outdated. Thus, it is possible to affirm that not only the adoption of a clinical protocol, but its periodical updating is an important strategy to promote the rational use of drugs.


Assuntos
Posologia/farmacologia , Usos Terapêuticos , Albumina Sérica Humana/administração & dosagem , Hospitais Universitários/classificação , Brasil , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Dosagem/análise , Serviços de Saúde/normas
2.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 53(3): e00252, 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-889405

RESUMO

ABSTRACT This study was designed to investigate the use of off-label and unlicensed drugs in a Neonatal Care Unit (NCU) and to compare the frequency of use of off-label drugs according to the drug regulatory agencies in Brazil (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária-ANVISA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A prospective observational study was carried out in the NCU. Prescriptions were classified as off-label and unlicensed using both ANVISA and FDA criteria. A total of 157 newborns and 1187 prescriptions were analyzed. The most prescribed drug was fentanyl (9.3%), followed by multivitamin (8.4%) and gentamicin (7.9%). According to ANVISA criteria, there were 665 (56.0%) off-label prescriptions and 86 (7.2%) unlicensed prescriptions and 95.5% of newborns received at least one drug off-label. By contrast, according to FDA criteria, there were 592 (49.9%) off-label prescriptions and 84 (7.1%) unlicensed prescriptions, and 72.0% of newborns received at least one drug off-label. The off-label use of drugs registered by ANVISA differed significantly from that of drugs registered by the FDA. There was a high frequency of off-label and unlicensed drug use in the investigated NCU, and there was an inverse relationship between off-label and unlicensed usage and the gestational age of the newborns.


Assuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Uso Off-Label/normas , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Brasil/etnologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/provisão & distribuição , Drogas Ilícitas , Tratamento Farmacológico , Neonatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...